![]() The enemy AI can offer a challenge, thought. The levels are linear and the missions, while sometimes vague in their objectives, are solved by following an icon throughout. All that being said, the campaign is still fun to play for a few hours. It looks amazing at times, but never original. You won’t discover a single original level in BF3’s campaign. ![]() Going back even a bit further, BF3 is almost a remake of Criterion Games’ classic last-gen title, Black, and reminiscent of every current military-themed shooter. It isn’t even just CoD that the game borrows from. An incident about half way through feels so extremely similar to one of the big moments in CoD 4: Modern Warfare that the big shock it’s supposed to carry turns out not to be a shock at all. It even has you chasing a Russian named Kaffarov, a name that even sounds like Makarov, one of the antagonists of the Modern Warfare series. Blackburne, who is being interrogated, the game shifts focus to a handful of other characters, just like CoD. Despite the primary focus on the soldier, Sgt. It also borrows heavily from Call of Duty’s campaigns over and over again. It boils down to the most generic of possible stories. In the confusion, the insurgents seize power, but a second group is working behind the scenes to move a trio of stolen nukes. Things go FUBAR when an earthquake hits and devastates part of Iran and Iraq. Call of Duty: Black Ops used the same setup, and it wasn’t original then either.įrom there, the game takes you to the Middle East, where an insurgent group is rumored to have a chemical plant in the middle of a city. A dark room, a pair of unidentified no-nonsense interrogators and a soldier who has been accused of something awful, but who claims to have done everything for the right reasons. It is all flash and very little substance.įrom the first moment the story begins, it’s hard not to have a sense of déjà vu. The problem is that the campaign is the equivalent of the stereotypical dumb blonde. The lighting effects are great, the particle physics are sometimes astonishing, and the textures are beautiful. The best thing about the BF3 campaign is that it’s pretty. So while BF3 might not be the game of the year that people have been expecting, it is still a solid entry - at least for fans of multiplayer. Then there is the campaign, which is something of a sore point. And while the online is as solid as ever, it is almost identical to BFBC2 with a few minor improvements. BF3 isn’t without its stumbling points though.įor as amazing as the graphics usually are, there are some moments where they don’t quite measure up, and the occasional glitch doesn’t help. The graphics are among the best of any console game, and the online that worked so well with Battlefield Bad Company 2 returns in all its glory. While the console version is slightly modified, it remains an exceptional game. ![]() ![]() To make Battlefield 3 run at the resolution we’ve seen in some of the trailers, you would need a computer that shames other computers. There are also some differences with the graphics. #Pixel 3 battlefield 3 wallpaper PcMost notably, PC version can handle up to 64 players online, making it totally different - not better or worse, just different. This review specifically covers the console version of the game, which has some significant differences from its PC counterpart. The wait is over, and the results are in. The new Frostbite 2.0 engine has become something of a synonym for great graphics and destructible environments, and all before the game was even released. Battlefield 3 has been wowing us for the last several months with screen shots that make us go all giddy, and gameplay that includes the possibility of using jets to bomb your online friends back to the Stone Age. To answer the number one question: Yes, it is very pretty. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |